An incident on Reddit made me field a bunch of letters which complain about censorship on my blog and claims that it is an invalid source.
Is there anything specific that I have done that makes my blog an invalid source? Considering on Deepak Chopra, I am both Indian (by ethnicity) and in Medicine. I am also well aware of quackery that comes from India and indeed real achievements of Historical Indian Medicine that we still use today and am probably a good source on the individual. Yet I am still considered by people as a “invalid source”.
OR are you simply complaining because you don’t like the platform that I write on? Is it the Font? Are the colours too distracting?
The people who have complained clearly haven’t read what I have written. Yet you have judged me. There are around 30 odd blogs on Freethought Blogs and you seem to have confused me with someone else. That’s like saying that you disagree with the policies of Google in China so you are going to refuse to read any blog hosted on Blogger…
You don’t disagree with what I write. You disagree with the soapbox I stand on rather than my issues. In fact you probably disagree with someone else on here and are using that as an excuse to actively run around denigrating everyone here. It’s like claiming to disagree with me because I support a different team or because I like marmite on my toast or that my shoes are black rather than brown.
You are using irrelevant arguments to ignore a genuine stance and that’s what’s harming atheism and skepticism.